November 29, 2006 - 11:03 pm
I have this idea just swirling around in my head about how the web makes history editable in a way that it never has been, before. Yes, history, written by the victors, but now? History is written (and edited) by anyone who wants to, really, which is one of the reasons that I applaud danah boyd’s idea to start recording the history of social networking sites (see this post) - get it down now, so that there is a record of what happened and when. What got me thinking about this is a blog I happened on the other day - really, a great essay about the importance of blogging - so well written that I bookmarked it to post here later, except….to make his point that he was an ‘expert’ in the field of blogging, the author pointed out that he was one of the ‘first bloggers’, and his blog was started on a Diaryland site in the mid 90s.
Which makes him an expert in revisionist history, since blogs didn’t exist in the mid-90s ( it was all about the personal home page back then!***). And semantics aside about what the form is called, Diaryland itself was created in September 1999. Needless to say, I am not linking the essay, or the author, even though I am intensely curious about how he has managed to bend time itself to make his claims true.
***randomly, now - Does anybody remember the documentary movie called Home Page, from 1998? I have a copy, and love it, mostly because I was such a fan of Justin Hall and his links.net webpage, and of course, everyone loved Carl Steadman, who definitely wins the ‘longest time between redesigns’ award, since i just googled him to get that link, and found his site exactly the way I remember reading it back in the late 90s. Can you even imagine trying to make a movie like that today, now that CMC is completly mainstream, and with the advent of vlogs?