Archive for the ‘Social Networks’ Category

Link Farm: 05.04.08

May 4, 2008 - 3:11 pm 1 Comment
  • ERNursey: It is my fondest dream that every politician in this country start reading a health care provider’s blog on a regular basis, so that they may better understand how money and power have isolated them from the health care crisis in America. See also, White Coat Rants, DB’s Med Rants, and Med Blog Groupie.

Salacious Gossip

March 3, 2008 - 10:16 pm No Comments

High up on the list of ‘worst ways to break up’ might be this: via Wikipedia. It gets more salacious, what with the saved IM chats, etc. She is known as Ann Coulter 2.0, he is a creator of Wikipedia, and when they broke up, it got public and ugly.

See also.

February 12, 2008 - 7:00 pm No Comments

89 Second Jane.

Linkfarm: 1.15.08

January 15, 2008 - 6:14 pm No Comments

The Triumphant Return

November 11, 2007 - 11:53 pm 8 Comments

After clearing out more than 10,000 spam comments, although the email for this site is still non-functional (thanks, spam!), this site may or may not be working again. New design to come, but in the meantime, the last 3 things I looked at online:

Online Reputation - after the fact cleanup

January 13, 2007 - 8:35 pm No Comments

You cannot be interested in digital culture and not be interested in issues surrounding free speech - as the medium of CMC grows, questions regarding what can and cannot be said in online venues is in constant debate. So it was with interest that I recently discovered ReputationDefender, a site which states that, “who you are online is as important as who you are offline”. Can’t argue that! But in the FAQ, I found this, and it gave me pause:

Does ReputationDefender simply send cease-and-desist letters or sue everybody when it seeks to “Destroy” content?

No. Most of our approaches to effecting correction or removal of content are non-legal. We will only pursue legal options with the express consent of our clients, and these techniques are strictly optional and usually the last resort. They may incur additional cost.

There is some press and testimonial on the site, and I am curious to see how the ‘non-legal’ approaches are going to play out.

Drop Spots and offline/online Social Connectivity

November 12, 2006 - 10:24 pm No Comments

In 1997, I watched as a number of the personal websites that I read particpated in a group notebook project, each decorating one page of a blank notebook, scanning in and posting the page they had decorated, before mailing the moleskine off to the next participant. The premise was a simple one - a moleskine, mailed from one person to the next, and each recipient decorating and/or filling up one page, and then finding someone to whom it should be mailed next, someone that they only knew in the context of reading each other’s personal web pages.
Two themes quickly emerged: the notion of connecting one’s screen life with one’s offline life, vis a vis giving out a real name/mailing address, to the person who wanted to send you the journal, and the notion of exclusivity and how that affects online relationships. That second theme is a whole other post!
It was the beginning of deciding who to trust, oneline - who could have your real name, who could place you in ‘the big blue box’. These experiments continued, in various formats, including two of my favourites - Where’s George, and Dropspots. I just got a Where’s George bill the other day, and dutifully logged in to register it. This is the second bill I have recieved with a Where’s George stamp on it, and as it turns out, the person that registered it has registered more than thirty four thousand bills. That is some serious commitment to outsider social connection.

Dropspots is new, and a little more personal than wheresgeorge - a harkening back to the whole moleskine journal idea. In their FAQ, they say this: Leave things of little or no financial value. Leave things that you’d like people to add to, or modify in some way. It is amazing to me the lengths to which humans will go in order to connect with one another.